Local Fairness in Hedonic Games via Individual Threshold Coalitions
نویسندگان
چکیده
Hedonic games are coalition formation games where players only specify preferences over coalitions they are part of. We introduce and systematically study local fairness notions in hedonic games by suitably adapting fairness notions from fair division. In particular, we introduce three notions that assign to each player a threshold coalition that only depends on the player’s individual preferences. A coalition structure (i.e., a partition of the players into coalitions) is considered locally fair if all players’ coalitions in this structure are each at least as good as their threshold coalitions. We relate our notions to previously studied concepts and show that our fairness notions form a proper hierarchy. We also study the computational aspects of finding threshold coalitions and of deciding whether fair coalition structures exist in additively separable hedonic games. At last, we investigate the price of fairness.
منابع مشابه
Fair and Square: Issues of Fairness and Computation in Partition Problems
This thesis deals with fair division of indivisible goods and with hedonic games. Both are vibrant fields in the multiagent systems and artificial intelligence community. Fair division of indivisible goods is concerned with the distribution of goods under possibly conflicting interests of agents, whereas hedonic games model issues of coalition formation. For fair division of indivisible goods, ...
متن کاملBoolean Hedonic Games
We study hedonic games with dichotomous preferences. Hedonic games are cooperative games in which players desire to form coalitions, but only care about the makeup of the coalitions of which they are members; they are indifferent about the makeup of other coalitions. The assumption of dichotomous preferences means that, additionally, each player’s preference relation partitions the set of coali...
متن کاملIndividual Stability in Hedonic Coalition Formation
I study the existence of Nash-stable and individually stable coalition structures in hedonic coalition formation games, where a coalition structure is a partition of the players, and players strictly rank the coalitions to which they belong. The hedonic coalition formation game in which all coalitions are feasible is viewed as a general model, and more specific models, such as the marriage and ...
متن کاملIndividual-based stability in hedonic games depending on the best or worst players
We consider classes of hedonic games in which each player’s preferences over coalition structures are induced by the best player (Band B-hedonic games) or the worst player (Wand W-hedonic games) in his coalition. For these classes, which allow for concise representation, we analyze the computational complexity of deciding the existence of and computing individually stable, Nash stable, and indi...
متن کاملHedonic Games
Coalitions are a central part of economic, political, and social life, and coalition formation has been studied extensively within the mathematical social sciences. Agents (be they humans, robots, or software agents) have preferences over coalitions and, based on these preferences, it is natural to ask which coalitions are expected to form, and which coalition structures are better social outco...
متن کامل